Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RPFAM No.245 of 2022
Amar Kumar Rout …. Petitioner
Mr. G. Muduli, Advocate
-versus- Monalisha Rout and another …. Opposite Parties Ms. Ritupurna Chaterjee, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Amit Prasad Bose, Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO
Order No.
ORDER 20.07.2026 (Hybrid Mode)
04.
1. The matter was presented on 30.09.2022 and defects were directed to be removed by the Deputy Registrar (J), Lawzima by order dated 21.11.2025.
2. On 01.05.2026 the following order was passed:
“1. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the opposite party that he has not been served with copy of the petition.
2. The defect pointed by the S.R. shall be removed within two weeks.
3. If defects are removed, the matter shall be listed for ‘Fresh Admission’ in the week commencing 29.06.2026. Copy of this order shall be intimated to the learned counsel for the petitioner by the Registry. Learned counsel for the petitioner shall serve copy of the p. 2 petition on Ms. Sahu, learned counsel for the opposite parties.
Thereafter, on 02.07.2026, the following order was passed:
“2. By order dated 01.05.2026, copy of the order was directed to be intimated to the
learned counsel for the petitioner by the Registry. Apparently, since 2022 no steps have been taken.
3. To grant further opportunity to the petitioner, the matter shall be listed on 20.07.2026 indicating that the matter shall be
disposed of.
Copy of this order and order dated 01.05.2026 shall be communicated to the
learned counsel for the petitioner by the Registry.”
3. Today, the matter being listed under the heading for orders, memo of date is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner which states thus:
“That learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has no instruction in the matter, hence appropriate order may kindly be passed in this case.” (sic)
The memo is taken on record. Scanned copy be updated.
4. Apparently, after filing of the case the petitioner is not prosecuting the matter and sufficient indulgence has been shown by this Court. As directed by earlier p. 3 order dated 02.07.2026 it is indicated in the cause list
“the matter shall be disposed of”.
5. In view of the above, the petition stands disposed of.
Copy of this order shall be forwarded by the Registry to the learned Judge, Family Court, Dhenkanal to be kept in the records of Cr.P. No.1 of 2021 disposed of by judgment dated 28.01.2022.
(Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo) Judge jyotsna