SAIQA NABI v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT)
WP(C)/1109/2022 · 2026-08-29
Shahzad Azeem
Writ Petition (Civil)body2022
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 1078 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 1078 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No. 47
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 1109/2022 SAIQA NABI …Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through: None. Vs.
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS ...Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Nowbahar Khan, Assisting Counsel.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE
O R D E R 29.08.2026
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that during the pendency of the writ petition, case of the petitioner was considered by the respondents and same was found devoid of merit, accordingly, stood rejected. In this regard, a detailed order dated 05.08.2024 was passed. Be that as it may. There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner for the last two consecutive dates of hearing. Today also, neither the petitioner nor her counsel is present. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the case. In view of above, petition is dismissed in default and for non- prosecution. Interim direction(s), if any, shall stand vacated.
(SHAHZAD AZEEM)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 29.08.2026 Ishaq
Isaq Hameed Bhat I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 29.08.26