Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2022 DAILYLAW 1071 (JK)

MUKHTAR AHMAD BHAT v. VIJAY KUMAR BIDHURI AND ORS. (REVENUE DEPARTMENT)

CCP(S)/184/2022 · 2026-08-04

Moksha Khajuria Kazmi

Contempt Petitionbody2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Sr. No.53 Regular List IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CCP(S) 184/2022 in[OWP 160/2017] CM(676/2025) MUKHTAR AHMAD BHAT …Petitioner(s)/appellant(s) Through: Mr. N.A. Tabasum, Advocate Vs. VIJAY KUMAR BIDHURI AND ORS. (REVENUE DEPARTMENT) ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Faizan Ahmad Ganai, CGC CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE O R D E R 04-08-2026 01. By way of the present contempt petition, the petitioner has alleged non-compliance of the judgment dated 23.02.2017. The operative portion of the said judgment reads as under: "Writ petition, in view of the grounds urged and submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner at the Bar, is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners for providing employment to petitioner No. 2 in the light of the averments made in the petition, the annexures appended thereto, and the rules governing the field. Such consideration shall be accorded and an appropriate decision shall be taken within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order, along with the complete paper book, is served upon the respondents." 02. Learned counsel for the respondents has produced the speaking order dated 12.03.2026, whereby the claim of the petitioner has been considered and rejected being devoid of any merit. The said order is taken on record. Shameem Hamid Mir 2026.08.10 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 03. From the perusal of the speaking order, it is evident that the respondents have complied with the directions contained in the judgment dated 23.02.2017 by considering the petitioner's claim and passing a reasoned order thereon. 04. Accordingly, this Court is satisfied that the judgment dated 23.02.2017 stands complied with in its letter and spirit. 05. The contempt proceedings are, accordingly, closed. However, liberty is given to challenge the consideration order dated 12.03.2026, if aggrieved. 06. Disposed of along with all connected CMPs. (MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI) JUDGE SRINAGAR 04-08-2026 Shameem H. Shameem Hamid Mir 2026.08.10 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document