SANGITA PARIDA v. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, BPUT, ROURKELA
WP(C)/23386/2022 · 2026-07-17
Manash Ranjan Pathak, Sibo Sankar Mishra
Writ Petition (Civil)body2022
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 1052 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 1052 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.23386 of 2022
Sangita Parida …. Petitioner(s) Represented by Adv.– Mr. Hritik Ranjan Dash, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Bijaya Kumar Dash, Senior Advocate -Versus- The Vice Chancellor, BPUT, Rourkela and others …. Opposite Party(s) Represented by Adv. Mr. Partha Sarathi Nayak, Advocate (for opposite party Nos.1 and 2)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK AND HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SIBO SANKAR MISHRA
Order No.
ORDER 17.07.2026
02.
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
(Manash Ranjan Pathak) Judge
(Sibo Sankar Mishra) Judge
Ashok/Swarna MOHAPATRA