Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2022 DAILYLAW 1048 (ORI)

PRASANNJIT NAYAK v. STATE OF ODISHA

CRLMP/410/2022 · 2026-07-15

Miss Savitri Ratho

body2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMP No. 410 of 2022 Prasannjit Nayak … Petitioner Mr. Sidhartha Das, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and Others … Opp. Parties Mr. Amitabh Pradhan, ASC CORAM: HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO ORDER Order No. 15.07.2026 11. (Through hybrid Mode) 1. This CRLMP has been filed to quash the FIR/Criminal Proceeding vide Jakhapura P.S. Case No. 06 of 2022 corresponding to C.T. Case No. 102 of 2022 pending in the Court of the learned JMFC, Jajpur Road. 2. On 04.04.2022, while directing the learned State Counsel to obtain instructions in I.A. No. 59 of 2022, a coordinate Bench of this Court had directed that no coercive action should be taken against the Petitioner till the next date of listing. Thereafter, the matter has been adjourned on 18.04.2022, 06.09.2024, 28.10.2024, 13.11.2024, 04.12.2024, 30.06.2026, 07.07.2026 and 10.07.2026. 3. On 10.07.2026, learned State Counsel had been directed p. 2 puspa to obtain instructions regarding present status of investigation as well as the up-to-date case diary in Jakhapura P.S. Case No. 06 of 2022. 4. Pursuant to the said order, instructions dated 14.07.2026 of the IIC, Jakhapura P.S. are produced by Mr. Amitabh Pradhan, learned Additional Standing Counsel where it is stated that after completion of investigation, Final Form as Chargesheet No. 142 dated 31.12.2022 has been submitted against the Petitioner under Section 379 of IPC and Section 21 of the MMDR Act. 5. In view of the said development, the CRLMP is disposed of as infructuous. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case of the Petitioner. 7. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application. (Savitri Ratho) Judge