RAHMIT DIN v. U T OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY EDU DEPTT AND OTHERS
WP(C)/2911/2022 · 2026-07-29
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2022
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 1043 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 1043 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP (C) No. 2911/2022
Rahmit Din …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs
U.T. of J&K and others .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Chetna Manhas, Assisting Counsel to Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG for R-1to 4 Mr. Shahid Fareed, Advocate for R-5
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 29.07.2026
1. The record reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 20.07.2026 and same is the position today as well. Thus, an inference can be drawn that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the instant petition. The instant petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecuting.
2. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge Jammu 29.07.2026 Nikhil
Sr. No. 03