IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 27955 of 2022 Samreedhi Nath …. Petitioner Represented by Adv.– Mr. Pradipta Kishore Bhuyan, Advocate -Versus- Union of India & Others …. Opposite Parties Represented by Adv._ Mr. Prasanna Kumar Parhi, DSGI along with Mr. D. Gochhayat, CGC Mr. R.C. Mohanty, Advocate (for opposite party No.3) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK AND HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN Order No. ORDER 13.07.2026 (Hybrid mode) 03. 1. The instant application on board dated 11.11.2022, none appeared for the petitioner. Today on repeated calls none appeared for the petitioner. 2. Perusal of record reveals that the petitioner has prayed for grant of following relief(s):- “It is therefore most humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit the writ petition and issue RULE NISI calling upon the Opposite Parties to show cause as to why the date of MOP -up Round of online counselling for 50% All India Quota PG seats shall not be modified / rescheduled subject to completion of Round-2 of Counselling for State Quota seats. And /or as why the guideline framed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court shall not be obeyed while conducting the Mop-up round Counselling for 50% All India Quota Seats; And if they show no cause or show insufficient cause this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to make the Rule absolute. And pass such other order/orders as may be deemed fit and proper for the interest of justice. And for this act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.” 3. Mr. Deepak Ku. Gochhayat, learned Central Government Counsel submitted that by efflux of time, the prayer(s) of petitioner has been rendered infructuous. 4. Faced with above situation, this Court does not feel it proper to adjourn the matter and keep the writ petition pending. 5. Hence, the present writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. (Manash Ranjan Pathak) Judge (Murahari Sri Raman) Judge Narayan