HIGH COURT OF JAMMU, KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 1353/2022 Sheila Devi alias Sushma …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Ajay Sharma Sr. Adv. with Mr. Kalik Sharma, Adv. q vs Union of India and others .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Vishal Sharma, DSGI with Mr. Karan Sharma, CGSC for Nos. 1 and 2 Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE ORDER 22.07.2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that respondent Nos. 3 to 5 be deleted as the main relief has been sought by the petitioner in the present petition against the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 only. In the writ petition, the petitioner has sought writ of prohibition, restraining/prohibiting officials working under respondent Nos. 1 and 2 from interfering into peaceful and settled possession of the petitioner, over the land measuring 03 kanals falling under khasra No. 1039 and 04 kanals falling under khasra No. 1041, total 07 kanals of land situated at village Chowadhi, Tehsil Bahu, District Jammu. 2. Respondent No. 1 has filed the response, stating therein that respondent No. 1 be deleted from the array of respondents, whereas respondent No. 2 in its response at paragraph 5 has stated that the land measuring 35 kanals falling under khasra No. 1049 situated at Chowadi, Tehsil Bahu, District Jammu was officially handed over to the answering respondent and sign board was installed by the J&K Government Agencies, as 13 WP(C) No. 1353/2022 Page 2 of 2 such, there is no question of threatening the petitioner and snatching her land. It is further submitted that the Revenue Authorities have identified 35 kanals falling under khasra No. 1049 situated at Chowadi, Tehsil Bahu, District Jammu for allotment to the answering respondent. As per the averments of the petition, the land of the petitioner falls under khasra Nos. 1039 and 1041 situated at that place. 3. In view of the above, the respondent No. 1 is deleted from the array of the respondents. As the respondent No. 2 has categorically stated in its response that they are not interfering with the possession of land belonging to the petitioner, no direction is required to be issued in the present petition. 4. Disposed of. (RAJNESH OSWAL) JUDGE Jammu 22.07.2026 Rakesh PS Rakesh Kumar 2026.07.23 11:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Jammu