IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Revision No. 702 of 2022 Date of Decision: 05.08.2026. Divesh Shandil ...Applicant/Petitioner Versus Gulab Singh Thakur ...Non-applicant/Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the Applicant/Petitioner : Mr. Abhinav Mohan Goel, Legal Aid Counsel. For the Non-Applicant/Respondent : Mr. Neel Kamal Sharma, Advocate. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the applicant/convict has produced the receipt dated 19.03.2026, issued by Member Secretary, H.P. Legal Services Authority, Kasumpti, Shimla, regarding the deposit of ₹45,000/- being the 15% of the cheque amount of ₹3,00,000/-, which is taken on record. 2. The record shows that the petitioner/accused was convicted and sentenced by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.2, Shimla, H.P. on 12.11.2020, in Criminal 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 Case No. 133/2 of 2018, titled Gulab Singh Thakur vs. Divesh Shandil as affirmed by learned Additional Sessions Judge(I), Shimla, H.P. in Criminal Appeal No. 19-S/10 of 2020 dated 26.02.2022 titled Divesh Shandil Vs. Gulab Singh Thakur. 3. It has been submitted that no amount has been deposited before the learned Trial Court or this Court. In view of this, no order is required to be passed for the disbursal of the amount by this Court. 4. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 5th August, 2026 (Nikita)