Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2022 DAILYLAW 1012 (HP)

Bihari Lal (deceased) through his LRs Satish Kumar v. Khushi Ram and others

CMP.M/1204/2026 · 2026-07-29

Romesh Verma

body2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Bihari Lal (deceased) through his LRs vs. Khushi Ram RSA No. 358/2022 29.7.2026 Present: Mr. C. D. Negi, Advocate, vice counsel for the appellant. Mr. Pawan, Kumar, Advocate, for the proposed LRs of respondent No.1. Mr. Rohit Advocate, vice counsel for respondents No. 2(i)(a), 2(i)(b) and 2(ii)(a) to 2(ii)(d) and 3. CMP (M) No.1204/2026 The present application has been filed by the applicant for bringing on record legal representatives of the respondent No.1, Khushi Ram, who is stated to have expired on 2.3.2026. Relevant copy of death certificate has been appended as Annexure P-1. For the reasons stated in the application, more particularly paras 2 to 4 thereof, which is duly supported by an affidavit, the application is allowed and consequently, the legal representatives of deceased respondent No.1, as mentioned in para 2 of the application, are ordered to be brought on record as respondents No.1(a) to 1(e) subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. RSA No. 358/2022 Mr. Pawan Kumar, Advocate, prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to file power of attorney on behalf of newly added respondents No. 1(a) to 1(e). Learned counsel for the appellant undertakes to file amended memo of parties within the aforesaid period. List in due course. (Romesh Verma) Judge 29.7.2026 (pankaj)