APHC010308122021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3397] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1479/2021 Between: 1. PEYYETI RANGA RAO, S/O LATE SEETHAPATI RAO HINDU, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, OCC. DOCTOR, R/O H.NO.3-3, RANGAPURAM, HAMLET OF PEYYCRU, MUDINEPALLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. SMT. PEYYETI SAVITRI DEVI, W/O RANGA RAO (DIED ON 29.9.2018), R/O H.NO.3-3, RANGAPURAM, HAMLET OF PEYYCRU, MUDINEPALLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. PEYYETI ANIL KUMAR, S/O RANGA RAO HINDU, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O H.NO.3-3, RANGAPURAM, HAMLET OF PEYYCRU, MUDINEPALLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. PEYYETI PADMAJA, D/O RANGA RAO HINDU, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O H.NO.3-3, RANGAPURAM, HAMLET OF PEYYCRU, MUDINEPALLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. PEYYETI VENKATA SEETHAPATHI RAO, S/O RANGA RAO HINDU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE,R/O H.NO.3-3, RANGAPURAM, HAMLET OF PEYYCRU, MUDINEPALLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. SATYAVOLU ROJALAKSHMI, W/O SREENU HINDU, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE R/O H.NO.3-3, RANGAPURAM, HAMLET OF PEYYCRU, MUDINEPALLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. KOLLI PURUSHOTHAM CHOWDARY, S/O VENKATESWARA RAO HINDU, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION R/O MUNIDAVALLI RAILWAY STATION ROAD MANDAVALLI VILLAGE, KAIKALUR MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT-521345 2. KOLLI CHANDRASEKHAR, S/O VENKATESHWARA RAO HINDU, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O K.C.P. COLONY,KANURU D.NO.7-640, PLOT NO.25,VIJAYAWADA. KRISHNA DISTRICT-520007 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to to punish the Respondents for willfully and deliberately disobeying the Orders of this Hon'ble Court made in ASMP.No.15024 of 2004 in AS.No.4106 of 2004 Dated.07.12.2004 Under Section 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act and under Article 215 of the Constitution of India, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. A VARALAKSHMI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. K J V N PUNDAREEKAKSHUDU THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1479/2021 ORDER:- Though the matter has been listed under the caption “for dismissal”, none appeared for the petitioner(s). It appears that the petitioner(s) is not inclined to prosecute the matter. Therefore, the contempt case is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending and the Interim Order granted earlier, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO Date: 07.04.2026 LSP 63 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1479/2021 07.04.2026 LSP