Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2021 DAILYLAW 911 (GAU)

PRABAL SUNDAR TAMULI v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS.

WP(C)/3900/2021 · 2026-06-04

Shamima Jahan

Writ Petition (Civil)body2021

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010112302021 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3900/2021 PRABAL SUNDAR TAMULI S/O- LT. S.N. TAMULI, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT KOKRAJHAR, P.O./P.S. KOKRAJHAR, DIST.- KOKRAJHAR, ASSAM, PIN- 783370 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. REP. BY THE COMM. AND SPL. SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING AND NH (ESTABLISHMENT) DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY-06, ASSAM 2:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING AND NH (ESTABLISHMENT) DEPTT. DISPUR GHY-06 ASSAM 3:THE CHIEF ENGINEER (BUILDING) PWD ASSAM CHANDMARI GHY-6 4:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KOKRAJHAR ELECTRICAL DIVISION KOKRAJHAR ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. U K NAIR, MR. R DE,MS. B BHUYAN,MS R SAHIN,MR. P K SARMA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, PWD, SC, BTC Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN ORDER Date : 05.06.2026 Heard Mr. R. De, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. R. Dhar, learned Standing Counsel, PWD and Mr. N.R. Sharma, BTC. By this application, the petitioner has prayed for an ex-post facto regularization of his service after his retirement. It is also stated by the petitioner that he had submitted a representation before the concerned authority and during the pendency of the instant writ petition, the said representation was considered and by speaking order, the claim of the petitioner was rejected. As such, Mr. R. De, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to file afresh if required. As such, this case is closed as withdrawn by giving a liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court if required. Petition is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant