APHC010391912021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION TRANSFERED FROM APAT NO: 945/2021 Between: 1. M M BASHEED BAIG, S/O M.MAHAMOOD BAIG, AGED 65 YEARS, RETIRED, WATCHMAN IN B.C.BOYS HOSTEL, KONDAMANCHUPALLI OF VONTIMITTA MANDAL,KADAPA (SENT ON DEPUTATION TO WORK AS PANCHYAT SECRETARY GRAM PANCHYAT, GANGA PERURU, VONTIMITTA MANDAL, KADAPA R/O BHAKARAPETA VILLAGE, SIDDAVANTAM MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,B.C.WELFARE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELGAPUDI, AMRAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER/DIRECTOR OF B C WELFARE, , VELGAPUDI, AMRAVATHI,GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT S C WELFARE OFFICER, Y.S.R.DISTRICT KADAPA 4. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, , MANDAL PRAJA PARISHAD, VONTIMITTA,KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, , Y.S.R.DISTRICT, KADAPA. 6. THE DISTRICT PANCHYAT OFFICER, Y.S.R.DISTRICT, KADAPA 7. THE COMMISSIONER, PANCHYAT RAJ ANDRURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT,SRICHARITHASRI BUILDING, D. NO. 29-6-8/ 1,NAKKAL ROAD,SURYARAOPET, VIJAYAWADA. 8. THE DISTRICT AUDIT OFFICER, STATEAUDIT, KADAPA,. YSR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): to declare the action of the respondents in not sanctioning and paying pensionary benefits to the applicant though he retired on 31.12.2013 by the orders of the 5th respondent dated 28.12.2012 as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequentially direct the respondents no. 1 to 3, 5 and 8 to sanction and release the pensionary benefits including gratuity to the applicant with 10 percent interest Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K R SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES II 2. Mattegunta.Sudhir,Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps,M.P.Ps,Gram Panchayats The Court made the following ORDER: Today, when the matter is taken up, Ms. G. Manasa, learned counsel representing Sri K.R. Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that that the cause in the writ petition (AT) does not survive and the writ petition (AT) has become infrucutous. 2. Recording the same, the Writ Petition (AT) is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 10.04.2026 IKN