Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2021 DAILYLAW 890 (GAU)

M/S GAYAN STEEL FABRICATION AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS

WP(C)/2302/2021 · 2026-04-29

Kaushik Goswami

Writ Petition (Civil)body2021

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010060102021 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2302/2021 M/S GAYAN STEEL FABRICATION AND ANR PROPRIETOR SRI NITU GAYAN S/O LATE BANAMALI GAYAN VILLAGE MURHANI, PO CHALCHALI PURANIGUDAM, PS SAMAGURI, DIST NAGAON, ASSAM 782141 2: SRI NITUL GAYAN VILLAGE MURHANI PO CHALCHALI PURANIGUDAM PS SAMAGURI DIST NAGAON ASSAM 78214 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE,ASSAM UDYOG BHAWAN, BAMUNIMAIDAM, GUWAHATI 781021 2:THE COMMISSIONER OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE ASSAM UDYOG BHAWAN BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI 21 3:THE GENERAL MANAGER DISTRICT INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE CENTRE NAGAON ASSAM 78200 Advocate for the Petitioner : MD. M H CHOUDHURY, MS. P CHAKRABORTY,B B Page No.# 2/2 KAKATI,MR I S MAZUMDAR,MRS. L N CHOUDHURY,MR. V ACHUMI,MR P R SARMA,MR MONZUR K CHOUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : SC, INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER Date : 30.04.2026 None appears for the petitioners on call. Mr. N. Das, learned Standing Counsel for the Industries and Commerce Department is present. It appears that on the last 3 (three) occasions, i.e., 17.06.2025, 15.07.2025 and 27.04.2026 as well, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners on call. In fact, the matter was listed today in the order column with the remark “For dismissal” reflecting the name of the learned counsel for the petitioners. Despite the same, there has been no representation. Considering consecutive non-representation on behalf of the review petitioners, the review petition stands dismissed for non- prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant