Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2021 DAILYLAW 885 (AP)

HOTHA SUBRAMANYA GANAPATHI v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/26496/2021 · 2026-04-09

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2021

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

::1:: APHC010421592021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] FRIDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 26496/2021 Between: 1. HOTHA SUBRAMANYA GANAPATHI, S/O HBS SARMA, AGED 49 YEARS, OCC. SERVICE, R/O 17-31-18, LALITHA NAGAR, TEACHERS COLONY, SIRI PLAZA, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, CO-OPERATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE CHAIRMAN, DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER FAC, THE DISTRICT CO- OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD., NO. 2351, P. B. NO. 38, NAGAMALLITHOTA, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction on petitioner's representation dated 14.09.2021 submitted for revocation of suspension order in Estt/2020- 21 Dt. 02.12.2020 issued by 3rd respondent from the post of Manager working in Kothapeta Branch of The District Co-operative Central Bank Ltd of ::2:: East Godavari District and reinstatement in to service, as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and offends Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to reinstate petitioner into service in the said post and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. GANTA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES II 2. SRINIVAS BASAVA ::3:: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA W.P.No.26496 of 2021 This Court made the following ORDER: Sri K. Ujwal Bharath, learned counsel representing Sri Ganta Prasad learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to file a fresh petition as and when cause of action arises and also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. Permission for withdrawal is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition as and when cause of action arises. No costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. _________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J DT: 10.04.2026 krk ::4:: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA W.P.No.26496 of 2021 DT: 10.04.2026 krk 130