Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2021 DAILYLAW 882 (AP)

Boya Koulutla v. .The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/13833/2021 · 2026-04-05

Subba Reddy Satti

body2021

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010239942021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] MONDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 13833/2021 Between: 1. BOYA KOULUTLA, S/O B.KESANNA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCC VIDYA COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN, R/O POTLAPADU VILLAGE, DEVANAKONDA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 2. P.VIJAYA BHASKAR, S/O P.JONAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O H.NO.1-219, POTLAPADU VILLAGE, DEVANAKONDA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. .B.SREENIVASULU, S/O B.RANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O H.NO.1-193, POTLAPADU VILLAGE, DEVANAKONDA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. Page 2 of 4 5. THE TAHSILDAR, DEVANAKONDA MANDAL, DEVANAKONDA, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 6. THE SARPANCH, POTLAPADU GRAM PANCHAYAT POTLAPADU VILLAGE, DEVANAKONDA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 7. THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, KRISHI BHAVAN, DR RAJENDRA PRASAD ROAD, NEW DELHI. R7 IS SUO MOTO IMPLEADED AS PER THE ORDER OF THIS COURT DT 14/02/2023. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 3 to 6 in demolishing the school building in Sy.No.76/2 an extent of Ac.0-24 cents of Potlapadu village, Devanakonda Mandal, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to reconstruct the upper primary school building in Sy.No.76/2 an extent of Ac.0-24 cents of Potlapadu village, Devanakonda Mandal, Kurnool District, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the school premises in Sy.No.76/2 to an extent of Ac.O-24 cents of Potlapadu village, Devanakonda Mandal, Kurnool District, pending disposal of the above Writ petition, and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dt 19-07-2021 made in WP. 13833/2021 and pass IA NO: 3 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim granted on 19-07-2021 in WP. 13833/2021 and dismiss the writ petition. Page 3 of 4 IA NO: 4 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the Interim Orders dated 19.07.2021 passed in W.P. No. 13833 of 2021 and dismiss the Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. U RAMANJANEYULU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K S MURTHY 2. GP FOR EDUCATION 3. GP FOR REVENUE 4. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV The Court made the following order: Sri B.S.Venkat Ramesh, learned counsel representing Sri U.Ramanjaneyulu, learned counsel for the petitioners, would submit that by efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition does not survive and hence, the same is now rendered infructuous. 2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous petitions shall stand closed. ______________________ SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J Dated: 06.04.2026 SNI 16 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.13833 of 2021 Dated: 06.04.2026 SNI