VIPAN KAKKAR v. SHRI MATA VAISHNO DEVI UNIVERSITY TH ITS REGISTRAR AND OTHERS
WP(C)/714/2021 · 2026-08-05
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2021
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 859 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 859 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 714/2021 CM No. 3164/2021
Vipan Kakkar …..Petitioner(s)
Through: Ms. Snigdha Shekhar, Advocate vice Mr. C S Gupta, Sr. Advocate
Shri Mata Vaishno Devi University & Ors .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Prabhat Sangotra, Advocate vice Mr. Rajnish Raina, Sr. Advocate
Coram:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER (05.08.2026)
01. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed and she has instructions not to press the instant petition.
02. In light of the statement made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
03. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU
05.08.2026
Vijay
S. No. 118 Vijay Kumar 2026.08.05 18.16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Jammu