AMAR LAMA AND 8 ORS v. OIL INDIA LIMITED AND 2 ORS
WP(C)/6993/2021 · 2026-02-03
Manish Choudhury
Writ Petition (Civil)body2021
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 844 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 844 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No. 1/3 GAHC010213982021
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6993/2021 AMAR LAMA AND 8 ORS S/O- MR. NIMA LAMA, R/O- BOKULONI NO 2, BOKULONI CHARIALI, PO AND PS- DULIAJAN, ASSAM-786602 2: LAKHINDAR CHOUDHURY S/O- LATE JHORILAL CHOUDHURY R/O- INDRAPURI COLONY DULIAJAN NO 2 CITY PO AND PS- DULIAJAN ASSAM-786602 3: SIPAHI SAHANI S/O- LATE BABULAL SAHANI R/O- SARUPATHAR BANGALI GAON CITY PO AND PS- DULIAJAN ASSAM-786602 4: HIRALAL DAS S/O- MR. JAGAI DAS R/O- VILLAGE- NO.3 NAHOLIA PO- DULIAJAN (KV) DIST- DIBRUGARH ASSAM-786602 5: GANGA CHETRI D/O- LATE RAJ MOHAN CHETRI R/O- BAR BALI GAON PO- TINGRAI CHARIALI PS- DULIAJAN ASSAM-786602 6: BIPUL DEBNATH
Page No. 2/3 S/O- LATE DEBENDRA DEBNATH R/O- BIJULIBARI ROAD 1 NO. DULIAJAN PO- ANANDAPARA PS- DULIAJAN ASSAM-786692 7: MINTU MONTRY S/O- MR. BROJEN MONTRY R/O- SILKACHUBAM VILLAGE PO- BAMUNIBILL NAHARKATIA ASSAM-786610 8: OM PRAKASH GUPTA S/O- LATE DEMAG CHAND GUPTA R/O- DX COLONY 2 NO DULIAJAN PO AND PS- DULIAJAN ASSAM-786602 9: RADHIKA CHETRI D/O- LATE KHANINDRA ADHIKARI R/O- NO 2 RANGAGORAH PO-LILAPUR PS- DULIAJAN ASSAM-78660 VERSUS OIL INDIA LIMITED AND 2 ORS REP. BY RESIDENT CHIEF EXECUTIVE, PO- DULIAJAN, DIST- DIBRUGARH, ASSAM-786602 2:THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER-CONTRACTS CONTRACTS DEPARTMENT OIL INDIA LIMITED PO-DULIAJAN DIST-DIBRUGARH ASSAM-786602 3:THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER CONTRACTS(TS) OIL INDIA LIMITED CONTRACTS DEPARTMENT PO- DULIAJAN DIST- DIBRUGARH ASSAM-78660
Page No. 3/3 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. T BARUAH, MR. R PHUKAN,MS A DAS Advocate for the Respondent : SC, OIL,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 04.02.2026
Mr. R. Phukan, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the subject- matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Phukan, learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant writ petition being infructuous, is closed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant