RIAZ AHMED v. UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR TH SECY,DEPARTMENT OF FOOD,CIVIL SUPPLIES AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS
WP(C)/1774/2021 · 2026-06-29
Rajnesh Oswal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2021
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 819 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 819 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case: WP(C) No. 1774/2021
Riaz Ahmed
..... Petitioner(s)
Through :- None
Vs
U. T. of J&K & Ors.
.....Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. Ahtsham Bhat, Advocate for R-3 & 4.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 18.10.2025
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner and so was the case on the previous date of hearing as well, which suggests that either the grievance/concern of the petitioner has been redressed or he has lost interest in prosecuting the present petition. As such, the present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution alongwith all connected application(s). Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
JAMMU 18.10.2025 Suraj K. Singh Sr. No. 74