SURBHI RAJPUT v. UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR TH SECRETARY HOME DEPTT AND OTHERS
CRM(M)/777/2021 · 2026-05-30
Rajesh Sekhri
body2021
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 813 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 813 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRM(M) No. 777/2021
Surbhi Rajput
….. Petitioner(s)/ Appellant(s)
Through: None q
vs
UT of J&K and Ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: None
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
ORDER 30.05.2026
01. None for the petitioner. Same was the position on last date of hearing. A perusal of the file reveals that petitioner has, till date, not taken steps for the service of private respondent, at whose instance, impugned FIR came to be registered. It also reveals that learned arguing counsel for the petitioner last appeared in this case on 18.12.2023. All this is sufficient to indicate that petitioner is not interested in further prosecution of the case.
02. Hence, present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution along with connected application(s).
03. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Rajesh Sekhri)
Judge
Jammu 30.05.2026 Riya
Sr. No. 38