RAFIQ AHMAD BHAT AND ANR. v. TALHA NISAR BASU AND ANR. (HOME DEPARTMENT)
CRM(M)/173/2021 · 2026-05-19
Sanjay Dhar
body2021
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 802 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 802 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU, KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR (through virtual mode) CRM(M) No. 173/2021
Rafiq Ahmad Bhat and anr.
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None. q
vs
Talha Nisar Basu and anr. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Furqan Sofi, GA for No. 2 None for No. 1
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER 19.05.2026
1. Nobody has been appearing on behalf of the petitioners for quite some time. It seems that the petitioners have lost interest in prosecuting the instant petition. Accordingly, the same is dismissed for non prosecution.
(SANJAY DHAR)
JUDGE
Jammu 19.05.2026 Rakesh PS
31 Rakesh Kumar 2026.05.20 10:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Jammu