GULZAR AHMAD BHAT AND ORS. v. TARIQ AHMAD KHAN (FINANCE DEPARTMENT) (WP(C)/1913/2021)
CCP(S)/582/2021 · 2026-02-06
Javed Iqbal Wani
Writ Petition (Civil)body2021
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 790 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 790 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 21
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CCP(S) 582/2021 in[WP(C) 1913/2021 c/w WP(C) 1913/2021 CM(6379/2021 GULZAR AHMAD BHAT AND ORS. ….. Petitioner(s) Through: - None.
V/s TARIQ AHMAD KHAN
….. Respondent(s) Through:-
Mr.Alla-ud-din Ganai, Dy. AG. CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE
(ORDER) 06.02.2026 None has appeared on behalf of the petitioners for last three previous hearings, none appears today as well. Under these circumstances, contempt notice issued is recalled and the proceedings initiated thereon are accordingly, closed. However, petitioner is at liberty to seek revival of the contempt proceedings provided the cause survives.
WP(C) No. 1913/2021. None has appeared on behalf of the petitioners for last three previous hearings, none appears today as well. Absence of the petitioners is suggestive of the fact that they have lost their interest in prosecuting the matter anymore. As such, petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Interim direction, if any, subsisting as on date shall also stand vacated.
(Javed Iqbal Wani) Judge
SRINAGAR 06.02.2026
“Abdul Rashid
Abdul Rashid Ganaie I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document :10.02.2026 16:24