MOHAMMAD AFZAL BHAT AND ORS. v. RAJA BEGUM AND ORS.
CM(M)/163/2021 · 2026-04-28
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2021
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 774 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 774 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 03 Regular Cause List HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CM(M) 163/2021 CM(7216/2021.
MOHAMMAD AFZAL BHAT AND ORS.(SENIOR CITIZEN) ……...Petitioner(s) Through:
None
Versus RAJA BEGUM AND ORS. .……Respondent(s) Through:
None
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 28.04.2026
1. The record reveals that the cost of Rs. 1,000/- imposed by this Court vide order dated 11.08.2025 has not been deposited. Further, when the matter was taken up on 17.12.2025, proxy counsel sought an adjournment and the matter was adjourned subject to payment of an additional cost of Rs. 1,000/-. The costs imposed by this Court in terms of the aforesaid orders have not been deposited till date. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Thus, an inference can be drawn that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter any further.
2. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed for non- prosecution.
3. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE
Srinagar 28.04.2026 Sakeena