Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2021 DAILYLAW 741 (ORI)

SURAJ SAHU v. RAMRATI SAHU @ RAMABATI SAHU

CRLMP/189/2021 · 2026-06-29

Miss Savitri Ratho

body2021

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMP No.189 of 2021 1.Suraj Sahu 2.Smt. Janaki Sahu …. Petitioners Mr. Sudipta Panda, Advocate on behalf of Mr. D. Panda, Advocate -versus- 1. Ramrati Sahu @ Ramabati Sahu 2. Laxmi Gupta 3. Manju Sahu 4. State of Odisha …. Opp. Parties Mr. Swapnil Roy, Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO ORDER Order No. 07. 29.06.2026 (Through hybrid Mode) 1. This CRLMP had been filed for quashing the proceedings for maintenance initiated against the Peititoner under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 before the learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate Sadar, Sambalpur in Case No. 01 of 2019 and award of maintenance made against them vide Annexure-1 and Annexure-1/1 as well as the Execution Proceedings in Execution Misc. Case No. 01 of 2021. 2. On 15.05.2026, when the matter was taken up as no counsel appeared on behalf of the Petitioner, the matter had been adjourned to today. 3. Mr. S. Panda, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. D. Panda, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that during pendency of the CRLMP, the victim-Opposite Party No. 1 has expired. Hence, the Petitioners do not want to proceed with this CRLMP. He files a withdrawal memo signed by Mr. D. Panda, learned counsel for the Petitioner. It shall be scanned and placed in the digital record. 4. Mr. Swapnil Roy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Opposite Party No. 1 to 3 submits that he does not have any instructions regarding death of Opposite Party No.1. 5. Complaint in this case had been filed by Petitioners No. 2 and 3. 6. But as the Petitioners do not want to proceed with this CRLMP, this CRLMP is dismissed as withdrawn. (Savitri Ratho) Judge Subhalaxmi SAHOO