IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.10097 of 2021 Piyusa Prasad Misra and Others …. Petitioners Mr. S. Rath, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha & Others …. Opp. Parties Mr. P.P. Behera, ASC Mr. D.K. Mohanty, Advocate for O.P. No.2 to 4 CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER 09.03.2026 04. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Parties. 3. Even though the present Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioners inter alia with a prayer to quash Clause- 1 of order dated 31.01.2020, so issued by the Corporation under Annexure-2, but in course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners taking this Court to the information provided by the Corporation on 08/13.05.2025, contended that the decision taken by the Corporation so reflected in letter dated 08/13.05.2025 if will be implemented, petitioners will have no grievance. p. 2 p. 2 4. Learned counsel appearing for the Corporation has no serious objection to the course of action proposed by the learned counsel for the petitioners. 5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the submissions made, this Court while not interfering with the impugned office order dated 31.01.2020, directs the Corporation to implement the decision taken and provided under RTI, vide letter dated 08/13.05.2025 within a period of 3 (three) months from the date of receipt of this order. Petitioners are permitted to provide a copy of this order along with the RTI information communicated vide letter dated 08/13.05.2025 before Opp. Party No.3 for compliance. 6. The Writ Petition stands disposed of accordingly. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Basudev