Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 38632 of 2021 Rabinarayan Mohapatra ..... Petitioner Mr. P.K. Rout, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. P.K. Panda, ASC CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 16.03.2026 Order No. 02 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard Mr. P.K. Rout, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Mr. P.K. Panda, learned Addl. Standing Counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties. 3. The present writ petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:- “It is therefore, humbly prayed that your lordship may be graciously pleased to admit the writ application, issue RULE NISI, calling upon the Opposite Parties to show cause as to why the order dtd.4.9.2021 under Annexure-3 shall not be quashed and the petitioner's service shall not be regularised If the opp. parties fail to file show cause or give insufficient cause, make the rule absolute and direct the opposite parties to regularise the service of the petitioner with immediate effect considering the length of service in the interest of justice. And pass any order/orders deem proper in the interest of justice. Page 2 of 2. And for which act of kindness the petitioner shall as in duty bound ever pray.” 4. It is contended that the issue involved in the present case is covered by an order passed by this Court on 04.09.2025 in W.P.(C) No. 22987 of 2024. 5. Therefore, while quashing order under Annexure-3, the writ petition stands disposed of in the light of the order passed on 04.09.2025 in W.P.(C) No. 22987 of 2024. 6. The writ petition stands disposed of. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Sneha