Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2021 DAILYLAW 4248 (MAD)

M. RAJAMANI, v. THE DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION,

WA(MD)/1540/2021 · 2026-08-20

M Dhandapani, N Dilip Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2021

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.A.(MD) No.1540 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.08.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.DILIP KUMAR W.A.(MD)No.1540 of 2021 and C.M.P.(MD)No.6346 of 2021 1.M.Rajamani ... Appellants -vs- 1.The Director of School Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai – 600 006. 2.The Joint Director of School Education (Personnel), DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai – 600 006. 3.The District Educational Officer, Thuckalay Educational District, Thuckalay, Kanyakumari District – 629 175. ... Respondents ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.(MD) No.1540 of 2021 PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause XV of the Letters Patent Act, praying to set aside the order dated 30.11.2020 made in W.P.(MD)No.11338 of 2020 and allow this Writ Appeal. For Appellant : Mr.S.Anwar Sameem For Respondents : Ms.J.Saranya Government Advocate JUDGMENT [Judgment of the Court was made by M.DHANDAPANI, J.] Challenging the order of the learned Single Judge made in W.P. (MD)No.11338 of 2020, dated 30.11.2020, the present Writ Appeal has been filed. 2.Learned Counsel for the appellant would submit that the appellant was appointed as Office Assistant and thereafter, the post was re- designated as Lab Assistant and further he was promoted as Junior Assistant on 15.02.1994 and further promoted as Assistant in the year 1995 and the petitioner was fully qualified for the post of Superintendent. Thereafter, he retired from service on 31.05.2008. However, the appellant ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.(MD) No.1540 of 2021 claims that one Sivashankaran, who was junior to the appellant was promoted to the post of Superintendent and on par with the said Sivasankaran, the appellant claims notional promotion after retirement. This Court dismissed the Writ Petition and challenging the same, the present Writ Appeal has been filed. 3.Heard the learned Counsel for the appellant. 4.The facts in the present case are not in dispute. Admittedly, the appellant was initially appointed as Office Assistant and the said post was re-designated as Lab Assistant and promoted as Junior Assistant on 15.02.1994 and further promoted as Assistant in the year 1995 and retired on 31.05.2008. The petitioner claims that one Sivasankaran, was junior to him, however, a perusal of the records reveals that the said Sivasankaran was granted promotion to the post of Assistant on 04.04.1994, whereas the appellant was promoted as Assistant only on 20.10.1995. In the feeder category, the said Sivasankaran is senior to the appellant and hence, the order of the learned Single Judge is perfectly in order and cannot be interfered by this Court. ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.(MD) No.1540 of 2021 5.Accordingly, this Writ Appeal stands dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [M.D.I., J.] & [N.D.K., J.] 20.08.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet: Yes / No MR ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.(MD) No.1540 of 2021 To 1.The Director of School Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai – 600 006. 2.The Joint Director of School Education (Personnel), DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai – 600 006. 3.The District Educational Officer, Thuckalay Educational District, Thuckalay, Kanyakumari District – 629 175. ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.(MD) No.1540 of 2021 M.DHANDAPANI, J. AND N.DILIP KUMAR, J. MR W.A.(MD)No.1540 of 2021 20.08.2026 ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis