Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2021 DAILYLAW 418 (CHH)

VISHWANATH RATRE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/5602/2021 · 2026-04-09

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Public Interest Litigationbody2021

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT of CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5602 of 2021 1 - Vishwanath Ratre S/o Saheb Lal Ratre, Aged About 31 Years R/o Ward No. 12, Lohershi Janjgir Champa, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. 2 - Firat Kumar S/o Bisahu Lahare, Aged About 35 Years R/o Pipra, Kirit, Janjgir Champa, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. 3 - Satya Narayan Azad S/o Panchram, Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Arjuni, Akaltara, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Director, Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Joint Director, Education Division, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Collector, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Controller of Examination Board, Vyapam, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 7 - District Education officer, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nasimuddin Ansari, Advocate For State : Mr. Topilal Bareth, Panel Lawyer Digitally signed by NADIM MOHLE 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 10/04/2026 1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that by efflux of time, this writ petition has become infructuous. 2. Not opposed by the other side. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners, this writ petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- Rakesh Mohan Pandey JUDGE Nadim