Cont.P.No.1099 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09.07.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN Cont.P.No.1099 of 2021 Lakshmi Jeeva W/o. Jeevarathinam No.36, Sachidanandam Street Backside Kosapet, Chennai-600012. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Gagandeep Singh Bedi The Commissioner Corporation of Chennai Ripon Building, Chennai-3. 2. Saravanan The Executive Engineer Zone-6, Division No.78, Corporation of Chennai No. 158, Strahans Road (opposite To Mahalakshmi Theatre), Dashamakan, Otteri, Chennai-600012. Previously Zonal Office At No. 5, Anderson Road, Ayanavaram, Chennai-600 023. __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.1099 of 2021 3. Anshul Mishra The Member Secretary Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Thalamuthu Natarajan Maligai, No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai-8. Contemnor(s) Prayer : Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, seeking to punish respondents for wilful disobedience of the order dated 05.10.2016 passed in W.P.No.35378 of 2016. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Manoj Sreevalsan, For Contemnor(s): Mr.T.Gowthaman Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr.D.B.R.Prabhu Standing Counsel for R1 & R2 Mrs.P.Veena Suresh Standing Counsel for R3 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by G.Arul Murugan,J) This contempt petition has been filed alleging disobedience of the order dated 05.10.2016 passed in W.P.No.35378 of 2016. 2. Learned Additional Advocate General submits that in __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.1099 of 2021 compliance of the order, already lock and seal notice, followed by de-occupation notice, was issued and thereby, the order dated 05.10.2016 stands complied with. 3. Learned Additional Advocate General further submits that challenging the de-occupation notice, fourth respondent in the writ petition has filed a writ petition in W.P.No.34753 of 2023 and the same was disposed of by order dated 13.12.2023 with certain directions. Further, another writ petition was filed by some flat owners in W.P.No.407 of 2022 and the same was also disposed of by order dated 08.03.2024. 4. The only contention of learned counsel for petitioner is that in the subsequent writ petitions, certain undertakings have been given and the same were not complied with. 5. If the undertakings given in the subsequent writ petitions have not been complied with, it is for those petitioners to initiate contempt proceedings. __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.1099 of 2021 6. In view of the fact that Corporation issued lock and seal notice, followed by de-occupation notice, which is in compliance of the order dated 05.10.2016, this contempt petition is closed. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 09.07.2026 kpl __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.1099 of 2021 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN,J. (kpl) Cont.P.No.1099 of 2021 09.07.2026 __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis