Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2021 DAILYLAW 4144 (MAD)

A.ABDULLAH v. S.SADIQ ALI

OSA/185/2021 · 2026-06-29

K Govindarajan Thilakavadi, P Velmurugan

Transfer Petitionbody2021

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

O.S.A.Nos.185 & 189 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 29.06.2026 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI O.S.A.Nos.185 & 189 of 2021 A.Abdullah S/o.M.Abdul Salaam ... Appellant in both the Appeals Vs. S.Sadiq Ali, S/o.Sikandar Ali ... Respondent in both the Appeals Prayer in both the Appeals : These Appeals are filed under Order 36 Rule 9 of Original Side Rules r/w Clause 15 of the Letters Patent to set aside the order dated 11.09.2017 made in A.No.1003 in Tr.C.S.No.666 of 2008 & A.No.2640 of 2017 in C.S.No.762 of 2017passed by this Court. For Appellant : Mr.S.R.Raghunathan For Respondent : No Appearance ******* JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by P.VELMURUGAN, J.) Today, when the matter is called for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant in both the appeals represented that the sole appellant in both appeals 1 / 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis O.S.A.Nos.185 & 189 of 2021 are one and same and he died on 27.07.2025. 2 Even though the sole appellant died as early as on 27.07.2025, even after the lapse of 90 days, no steps has been taken to bring the legal representatives of the deceased appellant on record. 3 Hence these appeals stand dismissed as abated. No costs. [P.V. J.,] [K.G.T. J.,] 29.06.2026 cgi 2 / 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis O.S.A.Nos.185 & 189 of 2021 P.VELMURUGAN. J. and K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J. cgi O.S.A.Nos.185 & 189 of 2021 29.06.2026 3 / 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis