Banu @ Selvabanumathi v. The District Revenue Officer
WP/12249/2021 · 2026-03-23
Krishnan Ramasamy
Transfer Petitionbody2021
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 3906 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 3906 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP No. 12249 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23-03-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 12249 of 2021 Banu @ Selvabanumathi W/o.Murali, No.216-A, Green Palace Lake Road, Kumuli, Thekadi Post, Perumdedu Kerala- 685536 Rep. by her Power Agent , Mr.S.Sivakumar,S/o. Selvaraj, No.63B, Jones Road, Saidapet, Chennai- 600 015. Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The District Revenue Officer Chennai District, No.62, Rajaji Salai, Singaravelar Maligai, Chennai- 600 001. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Chennai Central Zone, Anna Nagar West Extension, Chennai- 600 101. 3.The Tahsildar Maduravoyal Taluk Office, Rajiv Gandhi Street, Maduravoyal,Chennai-95. Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, Directing the 3rd respondent to act upon the 1st respondents letter dated 03.01.2020 in Na.Ka. 43397/ 2019/ J14 within a time frame fixed by this Honble Court. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 12249 of 2021 For Petitioner(s): No Appearance For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Gowthamaraj, GA ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the 3rd respondent to act upon the 1st respondent’s letter dated 03.01.2020 in Na.Ka. 43397/ 2019/ J14. 2. Today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 3. On the other hand, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that the petitioner’s representation was duly considered and rejected vide order dated 05.12.2022 and hence, nothing survives in this petition. Therefore, he prays for dismissal of this petition. 4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record. 5. In the case on hand, today, it was submitted by the respondents that the petitioner’s representation was already considered and rejected vide order dated 05.12.2022 and hence, nothing survives in this petition. In such case, it appears that the said aspect may be a reason for non-appearance of the petitioner. Therefore, this Court is inclined to dismiss the present petition. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 12249 of 2021
6. In view of the above, by recording the submission made by the respondent, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No cost. 23-03-2026 nsa Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To 1.The District Revenue Officer Chennai District, No.62, Rajaji Salai, Singaravelar Maligai, Chennai- 600
001. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Chennai Central Zone, Anna Nagar West Extension, Chennai- 600 101. 3.The Tahsildar Maduravoyal Taluk Office, Rajiv Gandhi Street, Maduravoyal,Chennai-95.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 12249 of 2021 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. nsa WP No. 12249 of 2021
23-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis