1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPT No. 207 of 2021 1 - Gayatri Rolling Mills Private Limited, P. H. No. 15, Khasra No. 4/1, Gerwani Police Station Tahsil And District - Raigarh Chhattisgarh. Pin - 496-001, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - Union Of India Through Secretary, Central Board Of Direct Taxes, North Block, New Delhi., District : New Delhi, Delhi 2 - The Director General Of Income-Tax (Investigation), Aaykar Bhawan, Hoshangabad Road, Bhopal (M P), District : Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 3 - The Principal Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Central), Aaykar Bhawan, Hoshangabad Road, Bhopal (M P), District : Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 4 - The Joint Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Aaykar Bhawan, Civil Lines, Raipur Chhattisgarh 5 - The Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax-1, Income-Tax Office, Mahima Complex, Vyaparvihar, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. S. Rajeswara Rao, Advocate For respondents No.2 : Mr. Ajay Kumrani, Advocate holding the to 5 brief of Mr. Amit Choudhary, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 27.01.2026 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking following relief(s) : “(i) to call for relevant records of the respondents for its kind perusal. (ii) to direct respondents to issue all due refunds immediately. (iii) to direct respondents to pay interest at the rate of one half percent for every month or part thereof from the date of payment of tax to the date on which the -2- refund is granted as per provisions of section 244A of the Act. (iv) to direct respondents to pay additional interest at the rate of 3% per annum for the period starting after three months from the end of the month in which the order arising refund was received by the respondents till the date of issue of refund. (v) to direct respondents to pay costs of Rs.25,000/- towards costs of this petition for constraining the petitioner to re-approach the Hon'ble High Court.” 2. At the very outset, Mr. Kumrani, learned counsel appearing for respondents No.2 to 5 would submit that the petitioner has claimed refund of Income Tax and in this regard, a letter has been issued to the petitioner to appear before the competent authority for settlement of issue and refund of excess amount along with interest in accordance with law. 3. Mr. Kumrani, Advocate would submit that if the petitioners would appear before the authority concerned, appropriate decision would be taken by the said authority strictly in accordance with law. 4. Mr. Rao, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would endorse the submissions made by Mr. Kumrani. 5. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the documents placed on record. 6. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by respective Advocates and letter dated 09.01.2026 issued by the Central Circle 1, Raipur, this petition is disposed of. The competent Authority who issued a letter dated 09.01.2026 is directed to take appropriate decision pursuant to letter dated 09.01.2026 expeditiously strictly in accordance with law. sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Rekha