1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No.5043 of 2021 1 - Smt. Bisahin Bai Wd/o Late Tulsiram Sahu Aged About 80 Years Caste Sahu, Occupation Agriculture, R/o Gram Panchayat Mudhena, Tahsil And District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh 2 - Smt. Inda Bai Wd/o Late Shatrughan Aged About 55 Years Caste Sahu , Occupation Agriculture, R/o Gram Panchayat Mudhena, Tahsil And District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh 3 - Girdhar Sahu S/o Shri Shatrughan Aged About 28 Years R/o Gram Panchayat Mudhena, Tahsil And District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. 4 - Murari Sahu S/o Shri Shatrughan Aged About 22 Years R/o Gram Panchayat Mudhena, Tahsil And District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh ... Petitioners versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue, New Mantralaya, Atal Nagar , Nawa Raipur , District Raipur (CG) 2 - The Secretary Department Of Home Affairs , New Mantralaya , Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3- The Collector District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Superintendent Of Police District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. 5 - The Sub Divisional Officer (Rev.) Mahasamund, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. 6 - The Tahsildar Mahasamund District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. 7 - The Station House Officer Police Station City Kotwali, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh 8 - The Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Mahasamund, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh 9 - The Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Mudhena, Tahsil And District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh SATISH TUMANE Digitally signed by SATISH TUMANE Date: 2026.03.23 17:23:34 +0530 2 10 - The Secretary Gram Panchayat Mudhena, Tahsil And District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondents No.1 to 7 : Shri Deepak Kumar Singh, Panel Laywer For Respondents No.8 to 10: Shri Anurag Verma, Advocate Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal Order On Board 23/03/2026 1. No one appeared nor any representation was made on behalf of the Petitioners, even when this matter is called twice. 2. In the above circumstances, in absence of any representation, this Court is left with no other option, but to dismiss the writ petition for non-prosecution. 3. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. SD/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal) Judge Tumane