Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2021 DAILYLAW 3785 (MAD)

Manonmani v. The Principal / Commissioner of Land Administration

WP/12336/2021 · 2026-04-06

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2021

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.12336 of 2021 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.P.No.12336 of 2021 Mrs.Manonmani, D/o. Samagounder, Kozhimeganur Village, Venkatasamudrem, Pappireddipatti Taluk, Dharmapuri District, Pincode - 636 905 ..Petitioner Vs. 1. The Principal / Commissioner of Land Administration, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005. 2. The District Collector, Dharmapuri, Dharmapuri District. 3. The District Revenue officer, Dharmapuri and District. 4. The Revenue District Officer, Harur (Post), Dharmapuri (Post) and District. 5. The Tahsildar, Pappireddipatti Taluk Office, Pappireddipatti (Post), Dharmapuri District. ..Respondents This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for an issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the 3rd respondent to dispose of the petitioner’s Appeal dated 20.03.2013 received by them on 22.03.2013 after personal hearing within the time stipulated by this Court. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.12336 of 2021 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner : Mr.R.Prabhu for Mr.V.Raghupathi For Respondents : Mr.T.K.Saravanan, Additional Government Pleader ORDER The relief sought in the present writ petition is to direct the 3rd respondent to dispose of the Petitioner’s Appeal dated 20.03.2013, after affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the Petitioner, within a time frame to be stipulated by this Court. 2. Today, when this writ petition was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for Petitioner submitted that the Petitioner’s Appeal had already been disposed of by the 2nd Respondent vide Proceedings dated 23.11.2021 bearing Na.Ka.6535/2013/Tha2. Therefore, the relief sought by the petitioner has become infructuous and nothing survives in this writ petition for further adjudication. 3. In view of the above submissions made by the learned counsel for Petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. 06-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order mrr https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.12336 of 2021 __________ Page3 of 4 To 1. The Principal / Commissioner of Land Administration, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005. 2. The District Collector, Dharmapuri, Dharmapuri District. 3. The District Revenue Officer, Dharmapuri and District. 4. The Revenue District Officer, Harur (Post), Dharmapuri (Post) and District. 5. The Tahsildar, Pappireddipatti Taluk Office, Pappireddipatti (Post), Dharmapuri District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.12336 of 2021 __________ Page4 of 4 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. mrr W.P.No.12336 of 2021 06-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis