Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2021 DAILYLAW 2956 (DEL)

VIRENDRA LAL TULI v. NEW DELHI MUNCIPAL COUNCIL & ANR.

CONT.CAS(C)/492/2021 · 2026-09-15

Amit Bansal

Writ Petition (Civil)body2021

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CONT.CAS(C) 492/2021 & connected matters $~9 to 11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 9. # CNR No. DLHC010226592021 + CONT.CAS(C) 492/2021 VIRENDRA LAL TULI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhanshu Batra, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Ritika, Advocate. versus NEW DELHI MUNCIPAL COUNCIL & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Zubeda Begum, Mr. Sanjay Sharma and Mr. Anand Kumar Sharma, Advocates for NDMC. 10. # CNR No. DLHC010074812021 + W.P.(C) 1072/2021 & CM APPL. 3019/2021, CM APPL. 76057/2025, CM APPL. 62765/2026 VIRENDRA LAL TULI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhanshu Batra, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Ritika, Advocate. versus NEW DELHI MUNCIPAL COUNCIL & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Zubeda Begum, Mr. Sanjay Sharma and Mr. Anand Kumar Sharma, Advocates for NDMC. Mr. Virendra Singh, Advocate for R-3, 4, 5 with Mr. Gaurav Tyagi, Attorney (Through video- conferencing) This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/09/2026 at 10:58:43 CONT.CAS(C) 492/2021 & connected matters Mr. A.K. Sharma, Advocate. 11. # CNR No. DLHC010065212021 + W.P.(C) 675/2021 & CM APPL. 1633/2021, CM APPL. 62687/2026 SMT NANDITA TULI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhanshu Batra, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Ritika, Advocate. versus NEW DELHI MUNCIPAL COUNCIL & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Zubeda Begum, Mr. Sanjay Sharma and Mr. Anand Kumar Sharma, Advocates for NDMC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R % 15.09.2026 CM APPL. 62765/2026 in W.P.(C) 1072/2021 and CM APPL. 62687/2026 in W.P.(C) 675/2021 1. The present applications have been filed on behalf of the petitioners to take on record the additional documents, i.e., the rectification orders dated 27th August, 2026 and the orders dated 27th August, 2026 granting vacancy remission in respect of the petitioners’ properties. 2. For the reasons stated, the application is allowed. The aforesaid documents are permitted to be taken on record. 3. The applications stand disposed of. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/09/2026 at 10:58:43 CONT.CAS(C) 492/2021 & connected matters W.P.(C) 1072/2021 and W.P.(C) 675/2021 4. It is submitted that the present writ petitions may be disposed of in light of the aforesaid rectification orders. 5. Counsel for the respondents do not oppose the same. 6. In view of the above, the present writ petitions are disposed of on the basis of all the aforesaid rectification orders. 7. Pending applications stand disposed of. CONT.CAS(C) 492/2021 8. In view of the order passed above, the petitioner does not press the present contempt petition. 9. Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed as not pressed. AMIT BANSAL, J SEPTEMBER 15, 2026 Vivek/- This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/09/2026 at 10:58:43