$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 475/2021 & CRL.M.A. 2461/2021 DAYANAND SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anand Chaudhuri, Mr. Deepanshu Mehta, Advocates. versus ITO INV UNIT 7 NEW DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anurag Ojha, SSC, Mr. V. K. Saxena, Jr. S.C. and Ms. Hemlata Rawat, Jr.S.C. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 21.07.2026 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the instant petition, he has availed the benefit under Vivad se Vishwas Scheme and has settled the dispute. According to him, in view of the applicable provisions, the prosecution question would not sustain and the complaint will have to be withdrawn. 2. Let this aspect be examined by the concerned Court where the complaint is pending. The Court, however, has no reason to deal with the merits. 3. The petition stands disposed of. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J JULY 21, 2026/P This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/07/2026 at 11:48:36