Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2021 DAILYLAW 2583 (PNJ)

SUMAN GUPTA v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

CWP/3969/2021 · 2026-08-27

Divya Sharma, Vikas Bahl

body2021

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP No.3969 of 2021 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 225 CWP No.3969 of 2021 Date of decision: August 27th, 2026 Suman Gupta .....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DIVYA SHARMA Present: Mr. Divyam Singh, Advocate for Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pradeep Prakash Chahar, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Deepak Sabherwal, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. This is a civil writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for setting aside the impugned order dated 01.02.2021 and order dated 25.10.2018. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has very fairly submitted that since vide letter dated 07.05.2026 issued by the Director of Town and Country Planning, Haryana, the petitioner has been granted the change of land use permission for setting up the restaurant, thus, he seeks to withdraw the present petition. It is submitted that the petitioner has met with all the conditions in the said CLU and in case the respondent-authorities do not carry out the spot inspection within time, then, liberty be granted to the petitioner to file a fresh petition, if need be. PUNEET SACHDEVA 2026.09.01 10:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh CWP No.3969 of 2021 2 3. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE August 27th, 2026 (DIVYA SHARMA) Puneet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No PUNEET SACHDEVA 2026.09.01 10:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh