IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 117 CWP-10464-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision : July 27, 2026 DAVINDER KAUR -PETITIONER V/S STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS -RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Sahil R. Bakshi, A.A.G., Punjab. Mr. Harneet Singh Oberoi, Advocate (Through V.C.) for the respondent No.3. *** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL) 1. On the previous date of hearing, i.e. 09.07.2026, this Court passed the following order:- “Learned counsel for the State, submits that on 21.07.2025, on the submission of the State, that the instant petition is not maintainable, as the issue involved herein, stands decided in CWP-18122-2018, decided on 01.06.2023, to which, no challenge has been made before the Division Bench. Learned counsel for the petitioner had sought an adjournment, to go through the decision (supra), and respond. Thereafter, the matter was adjourned twice. Today, no one has caused appearance on behalf of the petitioner, to address arguments. List on 27.07.2026. To be shown in the urgent list. No further request for an adjournment, on behalf of either of the parties concerned shall be entertained, on the next date of hearing.” 2. Today also, despite the case having been called twice, none DEVINDER YADAV 2026.07.28 09:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-10464-2021 (O&M) 2 has caused appearance on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that either the grievance of the petitioner no longer survives or she is not interested in pursuing the writ petition any further. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. Pending application also stands disposed of accordingly. (KULDEEP TIWARI) July 27, 2026 JUDGE devinder Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No DEVINDER YADAV 2026.07.28 09:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment