FAO-697-2021(O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 212 1. FAO RAM SARUP AND OTHERS THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS 2. FAO RANBIR AND OTHERS THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS 3. FAO MAHI PAL DECEASED THROUGH HIS LRS AND ANOTHER THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS 4. FAO AMI CHAND THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTH 5. FAO RAGHBIR DECEASED THROUGH LRS THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS 2021(O&M) and other connected cases IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH DATE OF DECISION : 22 FAO-697-2021(O&M) RAM SARUP AND OTHERS Versus THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER-CUM AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS FAO-698-2021(O&M) AND OTHERS Versus THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER-CUM AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS FAO-699-2021(O&M) MAHI PAL DECEASED THROUGH HIS LRS AND ANOTHER Versus THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER-CUM AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS FAO-700-2021(O&M) AMI CHAND AND OTHERS Versus THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER-CUM AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS FAO-701-2021(O&M) RAGHBIR DECEASED THROUGH LRS Versus THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER-CUM AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS and other connected cases p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 22.07.2026 …APPELLANTS CUM-COMPETENT AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS …RESPONDENTS …APPELLANTS CUM-COMPETENT AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS …RESPONDENTS MAHI PAL DECEASED THROUGH HIS LRS AND ANOTHER …APPELLANTS CUM-COMPETENT AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS …RESPONDENTS …APPELLANTS CUM-COMPETENT ERS …RESPONDENTS …APPELLANTS CUM-COMPETENT AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS …RESPONDENTS PRINCE SAINI 2026.07.24 11:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document FAO-697-2021(O&M) 6. FAO LACHI RAM THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS 7. FAO SATBIR SINGH THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS 8. FAO SUKHPAL SINGH THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AN 9. FAO SUKHWANTI THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS 10. FAO BIJENDER SINGH THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS 11. FAO RAGHBIR DECEASED THROUGH LRS THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS 2021(O&M) and other connected cases FAO-702-2021(O&M) AND OTHERS Versus THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER-CUM AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS FAO-704-2021(O&M) SATBIR SINGH AND OTHERS Versus THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER-CUM AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS FAO-706-2021(O&M) SUKHPAL SINGH AND OTHERS Versus THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER-CUM AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS FAO-707-2021(O&M) SUKHWANTI Versus THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER-CUM AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS FAO-709-2021(O&M) SINGH AND OTHERS Versus THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER-CUM AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS FAO-710-2021(O&M) RAGHBIR DECEASED THROUGH LRS Versus THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER-CUM AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS and other connected cases p. 2 …APPELLANTS CUM-COMPETENT AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS …RESPONDENTS …APPELLANTS CUM-COMPETENT AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS …RESPONDENTS …APPELLANTS CUM-COMPETENT D OTHERS …RESPONDENTS …APPELLANT CUM-COMPETENT AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS …RESPONDENTS …APPELLANTS CUM-COMPETENT AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS …RESPONDENTS …APPELLANTS CUM-COMPETENT AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS …RESPONDENTS PRINCE SAINI 2026.07.24 11:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document FAO-697-2021(O&M) 12. FAO MANNU AND OTHERS THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS 13. FAO SUKHPAL SINGH THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD A 14. FAO MANNU AND OTHERS THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS 15. FAO JAI CHAND AND OTHERS THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS 16. FAO SUKHPAL SINGH THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS 17. FAO MAHI PAL DECEASED THROUGH LRS AND ANOTHER THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS 2021(O&M) and other connected cases FAO-712-2021(O&M) AND OTHERS Versus THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER-CUM AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS FAO-713-2021(O&M) SUKHPAL SINGH AND OTHERS Versus THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER-CUM AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS FAO-2432-2021(O&M) AND OTHERS Versus THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER-CUM AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS FAO-2446-2021(O&M) AND OTHERS Versus THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER-CUM AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS FAO-2461-2021(O&M) SUKHPAL SINGH AND OTHERS Versus THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER-CUM AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS FAO-2483-2021(O&M) MAHI PAL DECEASED THROUGH LRS AND ANOTHER Versus THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER-CUM AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS and other connected cases p. 3 …APPELLANTS CUM-COMPETENT AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS …RESPONDENTS …APPELLANTS CUM-COMPETENT ND OTHERS …RESPONDENTS …APPELLANTS CUM-COMPETENT AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS …RESPONDENTS …APPELLANTS CUM-COMPETENT AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS …RESPONDENTS …APPELLANTS CUM-COMPETENT AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS …RESPONDENTS MAHI PAL DECEASED THROUGH LRS AND ANOTHER …APPELLANTS CUM-COMPETENT AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS …RESPONDENTS PRINCE SAINI 2026.07.24 11:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document FAO-697-2021(O&M) 18. FAO RAM SARUP THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS 19. FAO SATBIR SINGH THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS 20. FAO SUKHWANTI THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS 21. FAO SUKHPAL SINGH THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS CORAM : HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : None Mr. Sandeep Chhabhra, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. Vivek Singla, Advocate for LAPITA BANERJI, J. The appellants are not represented. No accommodation has been sought for on behalf of the appellants. 2. This Court notices that on previous occasions either learned 2021(O&M) and other connected cases FAO-2484-2021(O&M) RAM SARUP AND OTHERS Versus THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER-CUM AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS FAO-2486-2021(O&M) SATBIR SINGH AND OTHERS Versus THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER-CUM AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS FAO-2440-2021(O&M) SUKHWANTI Versus THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER-CUM AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS FAO-2457-2021(O&M) SUKHPAL SINGH AND OTHERS Versus THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER-CUM AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI None for the appellants. Mr. Sandeep Chhabhra, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. Vivek Singla, Advocate for respondents No.3 and 4. LAPITA BANERJI, J.(ORAL) The appellants are not represented. No accommodation has been sought for on behalf of the appellants. This Court notices that on previous occasions either learned and other connected cases p. 4 …APPELLANTS CUM-COMPETENT AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS …RESPONDENTS …APPELLANTS CUM-COMPETENT AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS …RESPONDENTS …APPELLANT CUM-COMPETENT AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS …RESPONDENTS …APPELLANTS CUM-COMPETENT AUTHORITY, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS …RESPONDENTS HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Sandeep Chhabhra, Addl. A.G., Haryana. respondents No.3 and 4. The appellants are not represented. No accommodation has This Court notices that on previous occasions either learned PRINCE SAINI 2026.07.24 11:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document FAO-697-2021(O&M) counsel for the adjournment has been made on behalf of the learned counsel for the appellants. 3. Learned counsel for respondents No.3 and 4 is present in Court. 4. It is apparent that the appellants have lost interest in the present appeals. 5. Accordingly, the present appeals are 6. Connected application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 7. After was made on behalf of the counsel for the appellants. This Court expressed its desire to recall the aforesaid order in the event the learned counsel was ready to address arguments. However, the lear to address arguments. Therefore, the aforesaid order was not recalled. 8. Keeping the interest of the parties in mind this Court grants liberty for restoration only in the event the learned counsel is prepared to argue the main case along with the restoration application. 9. Photocopy of this order be placed on the files of other connected cases. JULY 22, 2026 Prince Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : 2021(O&M) and other connected cases counsel for the appellants was not present in Court or request for adjournment has been made on behalf of the learned counsel for the Learned counsel for respondents No.3 and 4 is present in It is apparent that the appellants have lost interest in the present Accordingly, the present appeals are Connected application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. After passing this order in the morning request for adjournment was made on behalf of the counsel for the appellants. This Court expressed its desire to recall the aforesaid order in the event the learned counsel was ready to address arguments. However, the lear to address arguments. Therefore, the aforesaid order was not recalled. Keeping the interest of the parties in mind this Court grants liberty for restoration only in the event the learned counsel is prepared to in case along with the restoration application. Photocopy of this order be placed on the files of other connected cases. , 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No and other connected cases p. 5 was not present in Court or request for adjournment has been made on behalf of the learned counsel for the Learned counsel for respondents No.3 and 4 is present in It is apparent that the appellants have lost interest in the present Accordingly, the present appeals are dismissed in default. Connected application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. passing this order in the morning request for adjournment was made on behalf of the counsel for the appellants. This Court expressed its desire to recall the aforesaid order in the event the learned counsel was ready to address arguments. However, the learned counsel was not prepared to address arguments. Therefore, the aforesaid order was not recalled. Keeping the interest of the parties in mind this Court grants liberty for restoration only in the event the learned counsel is prepared to in case along with the restoration application. Photocopy of this order be placed on the files of other (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE Connected application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. PRINCE SAINI 2026.07.24 11:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document