HARJIT KAUR AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
CWP/21000/2021 · 2026-07-23
Namit Kumar
body2021
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 2520 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 2520 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-21000-2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Harjit Kaur & others State of Punjab & another
CORAM:
Present:
NAMIT KUMAR, J.
1. by filing the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to grant them revised lists E w.e.f. 11.05.2011 and as Inspector w.e.f. 26.02.2019 at par with their batch mates and juniors with all consequential benefits. 2. petition. 2021 (O&M) -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-21000
Date of Decision:
Harjit Kaur & others
Versus State of Punjab & another
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR
Mr. G.S.Bal, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Avtar Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Amarpreet Singh Bains, AAG, Punjab. NAMIT KUMAR, J. (Oral) The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court by filing the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to grant them revised lists E-I w.e.f. 01.04.2008 and grant of promotion as Su w.e.f. 11.05.2011 and as Inspector w.e.f. 26.02.2019 at par with their batch mates and juniors with all consequential benefits. On 31.01.2023, the following order was passed by this Court:
“Learned State counsel on instructions from I.O. su that the grievance raised in the petition no more survives, as the petitioners have been granted relief treating them at parity with their batch mates and juniors, as prayed for in the writ petition. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 226 21000-2021 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 23.07.2026
…Petitioners
...Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Mr. G.S.Bal, Senior Advocate, with
Mr. Avtar Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Amarpreet Singh Bains, AAG, Punjab. voked the writ jurisdiction of this Court by filing the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to grant them I w.e.f. 01.04.2008 and grant of promotion as Sub Inspector w.e.f. 11.05.2011 and as Inspector w.e.f. 26.02.2019 at par with their batch- mates and juniors with all consequential benefits.
On 31.01.2023, the following order was passed by this Court: Learned State counsel on instructions from I.O. submits that the grievance raised in the petition no more survives, as the petitioners have been granted relief treating them at parity with their batch mates and juniors, as prayed for in the writ
226 voked the writ jurisdiction of this Court by filing the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to grant them b Inspector - bmits that the grievance raised in the petition no more survives, as the petitioners have been granted relief treating them at parity with their batch mates and juniors, as prayed for in the writ
VIMAL KUMAR 2026.07.24 09:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CWP-21000-2021
3. submits that the benefits as claimed in the present petition have been granted to the petitioners and as such, the present petition has been rendered infructuous. 4. 23.07.2026 Vimal
2021 (O&M) -2-
Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for t instructions. On his request, adjourned to
Learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the benefits as claimed in the present petition have been granted to the petitioners and as such, the present petition has been rendered
Disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
Whether speaking/reasoned:
Whether reportable:
Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for time to seek On his request, adjourned to 19.10.2023.” Learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the benefits as claimed in the present petition have been granted to the petitioners and as such, the present petition has been rendered rendered infructuous.
(NAMIT KUMAR)
JUDGE
Yes/No
Yes/No
ime to seek Learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the benefits as claimed in the present petition have been granted to the petitioners and as such, the present petition has been rendered VIMAL KUMAR 2026.07.24 09:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.