RAM KUMAR AND ANR v. FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER, HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/5693/2021 · 2026-07-20
Pankaj Jain
body2021
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 2504 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 2504 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 255 CWP-5693-2021 (O&M) Date of decision : 20.07.2026 Ram Kumar and another ...... Petitioners versus Financial Commissioner, Haryana and others ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present: None for the petitioners. Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. Tushar Kush, Advocate for Ms. Garima Jindal, Advocate for respondent No.4(i) to (iv). **** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (Oral)
1. Counsel for respondent No.4(i) to (iv) points out that the partition stands effectuated as the co-sharers have been put in possession of their respective share.
2. No one appeared on behalf of the petitioners. Same was the case on the last date.
3. Dismissed for non-prosecution.
4. Since the main case has been decided, pending miscellaneous application, if any, shall also stands disposed off.
(PANKAJ JAIN)
JUDGE 20.07.2026
Dinesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether Reportable : No DINESH KUMAR 2026.07.23 16:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document