Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** 259
CR-1866-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision: 20.07.2026
INDIAN BANK …Petitioner Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS …Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- None for petitioner
Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, AAG, Haryana
Mr. R.D. Bawa, Advocate,
Mr. Samuel Gill, Advocate and
Mr. Randhir Bawa, Advocate
for respondent No.3/MCF
Ms. Aditi Sharma, Advocate and
Mr. Daaman Kaushal, Advocate
for respondent No.4(i)
Mr. Mahesh Dheer, Advocate for
Mr. Dheeraj Siwach, Advocate
for respondent No.5
***
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
1.
Case called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
2.
Dismissed for non-prosecution. The petitioner is at liberty to move an appropriate application within 1 year from today, if cause survives.
3.
Pending Misc. application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL)
JUDGE 20.07.2026 SDK Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
SUDEEPAK KUMAR 2026.07.21 11:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document