RADHA KRISHAN BHATIA AND ORS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR
CRM-M/30792/2021 · 2026-07-21
Sumeet Goel
body2021
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 2478 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 2478 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
(328)
CRM-M-30792-2021 Radha Krishan Bhatia and others
……Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and another
……Respondent(s)
Decided on : 21.07.2026 Date of uploading: 21.07.2026
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL
Present: Mr. Gourav Jain, Advocate for the petitioner (s).
Ms. Geeta Rani, AAG, Haryana, for respondent No.1.
None for respondent No.2.
***** Sumeet Goel, J. (Oral):
1.
The substantive prayer made in the instant petition reads thus:
“It is therefore, respectfully prayed that present petition may kindly be allowed and the impugned FIR No. 632 dated 28.12.2019, U/s 420/406 of IPC registered at P.S. City Tohana Distt. Fatehabad (Annexure P-1) and all other subsequent proceedings arising out thereto, may kindly be quashed, against the present petitioners, being abuse of process of law, in the interest of justice.”
2.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that, during the pendency of the present petition, challan (charge-sheet) has been filed and even charges have been framed. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner further submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition in hand, with liberty to file afresh on the same cause of action, after laying challenge to the challan (charge-sheet) as also the order framing charges.
3.
Ordered accordingly.
(SUMEET GOEL) July 21, 2026
JUDGE Naveen Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether Reportable : Yes/No NAVEEN NAGPAL 2026.07.21 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh