Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-10725
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Sarbjeet Singh through Special Power of Attorney Holder Jarnail Singh
State of Punjab
CORAM:
Present:
KULDEEP TIWARI
CM-11173
Main case
1.
out of two FIRs registered against the petitioner, FIR No.41 dated 03.06.2021, registered under Sections 341 Penal Code (Section 326 IPC added later on), at Police Station Khanori, District Sangrur, has been quashed by a vide order dated 07.07.2026 (Annexure P
2.
under Section 323 concerned, she fairly submits that the same 10725-2026 (O&M) -1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP
Date of decision: Sarbjeet Singh through Special Power of Attorney Holder Jarnail Singh Versus
State of Punjab and others
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI
Ms. Gurpreet Kaur, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sahil R. Bakshi, AAG, Punjab. Ms. Ayushi Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent-Union of India.
**** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (Oral) 73-CWP-2026 Application is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The documents are taken on record. Main case
Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, submits out of two FIRs registered against the petitioner, FIR No.41 dated 03.06.2021, registered under Sections 341 Penal Code (Section 326 IPC added later on), at Police Station Khanori, District Sangrur, has been quashed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court, vide order dated 07.07.2026 (Annexure P- So far as the second FIR, i.e. FIR No. under Section 323/324/34 IPC, registered at the same Police Station concerned, she fairly submits that the same 1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-10725-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 14.07.2026 Sarbjeet Singh through Special Power of Attorney Holder Jarnail Singh
….Petitioner
….Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI Ms. Gurpreet Kaur, Advocate, Mr. Sahil R. Bakshi, AAG, Punjab. Ms. Ayushi Sharma, Advocate, Union of India. Application is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The documents are taken on record.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that out of two FIRs registered against the petitioner, FIR No.41 dated 03.06.2021, registered under Sections 341/323/324/148/149 of the Indian Penal Code (Section 326 IPC added later on), at Police Station Khanori, Coordinate Bench of this Court, -21). second FIR, i.e. FIR No.86 dated 28.10.2022, , registered at the same Police Station, is concerned, she fairly submits that the same is pending. However, a
s that out of two FIRs registered against the petitioner, FIR No.41 dated 149 of the Indian Penal Code (Section 326 IPC added later on), at Police Station Khanori, Coordinate Bench of this Court, 86 dated 28.10.2022, is However, a AMIT KUMAR 2026.07.15 17:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
CWP-10725
petition for quashing been filed before this Court, wherein notice of motion has been issued, with a direction to the parties to get the Trial Court/I
3. seeks permission to withdraw the instant writ petition with liberty petitioner to obtaining leave Court, as and when the abovesaid quashing of the FIR
4. s
14.07.2026 Ak Sharma
10725-2026 (O&M) -2
petition for quashing of the said FIR, on the basis of compromise, has been filed before this Court, wherein notice of motion has been issued, with a direction to the parties to get their Trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate concerned. In the wake of the abovesaid factual aspect of the matter, seeks permission to withdraw the instant writ petition with liberty petitioner to either approach the learned Trial Court concerned, obtaining leave to apply for renewal of the passport or Court, as and when the abovesaid petition is decided, resulting in quashing of the FIR. Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty, as prayed for. 2026
Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2-
the said FIR, on the basis of compromise, has been filed before this Court, wherein notice of motion has been issued, ir statements recorded before the
abovesaid factual aspect of the matter, she seeks permission to withdraw the instant writ petition with liberty to the approach the learned Trial Court concerned, for to apply for renewal of the passport or to re-access this petition is decided, resulting in with the liberty, as prayed for.
(KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE Yes Yes/No
the said FIR, on the basis of compromise, has been filed before this Court, wherein notice of motion has been issued, statements recorded before the she to the for access this petition is decided, resulting in AMIT KUMAR 2026.07.15 17:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document