SHEKHAR AGARWAL SON OF SHRI RAMDAS AGARWAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/3701/2021 · 2026-03-13
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2021
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 2447 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 2447 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.3701/2021
1. Shekhar Agarwal Son Of Shri Ramdas Agarwal, Aged About 38 Years, Residence Of House No. B-5 Rammarg Shyam Nagar, Sodala, Jaipur (Raj).
2. Jatin Agarwal Son Of Shri Rajendra Kumar Jain, Aged About 21 Years, Residence Of House No B-7 Hardev Colony, Kalyan Nagar, Tonk Road, Thana Sanganer, Jaipur (Raj). ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Anshul Soni Son Of Shri Matadeen Soni, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of 1253 Kho Walon Ka Chowk, Gopal Ji Ka Rasta, Jhori Bajar Jaipur (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Neeraj Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Kartik Soni for Mr. Abhishek Parashar JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 13/03/2026
1. By way of filing the instant criminal misc. petition, a prayer has been made for quashing the F.I.R. No.06/2021 registered at Police Station Special Police Station (SOG), District ATS & SOG, for the offences under Sections 420, 406 & 120-B IPC on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.
2. At the outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant-respondent submitted that during pendency of the investigation, the complainant-respondent has entered into
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-3701/2021] compromise with the accused-petitioners, whereby the complainant-respondent does not wish to prosecute the accused- petitioners.
3. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on the record.
4. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter and looking to the fact that the parties have amicably settled the dispute and now, the complainant-respondent does not wish to prosecute the accused-petitioners and the dispute pertains to personal in nature, and applying the principles as laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the cases of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab reported in 2012 (10) SCC 303 and in the case of The State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Laxmi Narayan reported in 2019 (5) SCC 688, the proceedings arising out of the impugned F.I.R. No.06/2021 registered at Police Station Special Police Station (SOG), District ATS & SOG qua the petitioners, stand quashed and set-aside.
5. Accordingly, the instant criminal misc. petition stand allowed. The stay application and all pending application(s), if any, stand
disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/53