RAVINDER KUMAR SINGAL v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
CWP/4886/2021 · 2026-07-13
Namit Kumar
body2021
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 2429 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 2429 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 215 CWP-4886-2021 Date of decision : 13.07.2026 Ravinder Kumar Singal ….Petitioner V/S State of Punjab and another
….Respondents
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present: Ms. Malvi Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Raghav Garg, A.A.G., Punjab. Ms. Anju Arora, Advocate with Ms. Alisha Arora, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** NAMIT KUMAR
, J. (ORAL)
1. The petitioner has filed the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents for implementing the recommendations of 5th Punjab Pay Commission to the category of the petitioner (i.e. Company Secretary) and to grant revised pay scale of Rs.15600-39100 with grade pay of Rs.7800 w.e.f. 01.01.2006; upgradations after 4/9/14 years of service as per ACP Scheme; and arrears of pay with interest @ 12% per annum.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has unfortunately died in the year 2023 and despite her best efforts, she has not been able to contact the LRs of the petitioner and therefore, they could not be brought on record despite seeking various adjournments.
VINOD KOTHIYAL 2026.07.13 17:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
CWP-4886-2021 -2-
3. In this view of the matter, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution with liberty to the LRs of the petitioner to revive the same in case any cause of action still survives and if they are still interested to pursue the instant petition. 13.07.2026
(NAMIT KUMAR) kothiyal
JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No VINOD KOTHIYAL 2026.07.13 17:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document