IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 224 CWP-16732-2021 Date of Decision: 13.07.2026 DILBAG SINGH AND ANOTHER ... Petitioners VERSUS MANAING DIRECTOR, DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRN NIGAM LTD AND OTHERS ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY. **** Present: Mr. Sandeep Thakan, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Arvind Seth, Mr. Tilak Raj and Mr. Rajesh Gaur, Advocates for the respondents. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners relies upon the judgments dated 01.09.2009, Annexure P-3 and dated 24.02.2009, Annexure P-4 and states that their claim be considered in light thereof. 2. Learned arguing counsel for the respondents has no objection to the limited prayer made. 3. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to look into and decide the claim of the petitioners, expeditiously, in accordance with law taking note of the aforesaid judgments, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.07.13 18:21 I am the author of this document CWP-16732-2021 -2- them and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to their interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioners shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JULY 13, 2026. JUDGE Rajender Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.07.13 18:21 I am the author of this document