Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2021 DAILYLAW 2424 (PNJ)

RITU MALIK v. RANI ARORA (NOW DECEASED) THROUGH LRS & ORS

CR/4900/2026 · 2026-07-03

Harpreet Kaur Jeewan

body2021

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

initially vide order dated 27.09.2021 plaintiff to make minor amendments was Civil Procedure Code filed by the petitioner the petitioner only filed an application to place on record the signed and verified copy of the amended plaint. The trial Court erroneously treated the same as an application for amendment of the pleadings and permitted the respondent-defendant to file amended written statement. As such the impugned order is liable to be set asid -1- earned counsel for the petitioner initially vide order dated 27.09.2021, the application moved by the petitioner plaintiff to make minor amendments was allowed Civil Procedure Code, 1908 but signed copy of the amended pleadings was not filed by the petitioner-plaintiff. Subsequently to remove the legal objections the petitioner only filed an application to place on record the signed and verified copy of the amended plaint. The trial Court erroneously treated the same as an application for amendment of the pleadings and permitted the defendant to file amended written statement. As such the impugned order is liable to be set aside. earned counsel for the petitioner contends that the application moved by the petitioner- allowed under Order VI Rule 17, but signed copy of the amended pleadings was not plaintiff. Subsequently to remove the legal objections, the petitioner only filed an application to place on record the signed and verified copy of the amended plaint. The trial Court erroneously treated the same as an application for amendment of the pleadings and permitted the defendant to file amended written statement. As such the impugned contends that - , but signed copy of the amended pleadings was not , the petitioner only filed an application to place on record the signed and verified copy of the amended plaint. The trial Court erroneously treated the same as an application for amendment of the pleadings and permitted the defendant to file amended written statement. As such the impugned AVTAR SINGH 2026.07.10 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document order/judgment -2- AVTAR SINGH 2026.07.10 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document order/judgment