Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2021 DAILYLAW 2410 (BOM)

SANJAY S/O NARAYAN NAIK AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPT. MUMBAI AND OTHERS

WP/220/2022 · 2026-09-17

body2021

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

4-WP-3510-2021 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 3510 OF 2021 (Maharashtra Rajya Prathamic Shikshak Sangh & Ors. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.) WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6172 OF 2022 (Ramesh Duryodhan Pardhikar & Ors. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.) WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 275 OF 2022 (Yavatmal Zilla Parishad Prathamic Shikshak Shangh & Ors. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.) WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 220 OF 2022 (Sanjay s/o Naryan Naik & Ors. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.) __________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. WP 3510/2021 Mr. C.B. Pawar h/f Mr. P.S. Kshirsagar, Counsel for the petitioners. Mr. R.S. Khobragade, Counsel for respondent nos. 4 and 5. WP 6172/2022 Mr. S.G. Karmarkar, Counsel for the petitioners. Mr. R.S. Khobragade, Counsel for respondent no.4. WP 275/2022 Mr. C.B. Pawar h/f Mr. P.S. Kshirsagar, Counsel for the petitioners. Mr. S.S. Bhalerao, Counsel for respondent nos. 3 to 5. WP 220/2022 Mr. S.S. Dhengale, Counsel for the petitioners. Mr. T.M. Zaheer, Counsel for respondent nos. 4 and 5. Mr. S.B. Bissa, A.G.P. for the respondent/State. ..... CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE AND NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ. SEPTEMBER 17, 2026 WRIT PETITION NOS. 3510/2021, 275/2022 AND 220/2022 The Counsels for the petitioners jointly submit that the issue involved is covered by an order dated 16/4/2026 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No. 7949/2022 [Kishor Damodhar Khobragade & Oths. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & 2026:BHC-NAG:12399-DB 4-WP-3510-2021 2 Oths.] with other connected matters. The Court considered the judgment passed in Writ Petition No. 3642/2021 as also Writ Petition Stamp No. 9543/2021. The Court further considered the Circular dated 29/2/2024 issued by the Government of Maharashtra, and granted liberty to the petitioner to move fresh representation before the concerned Chief Executive Officer (CEO). The Court directed the CEO to consider the representation in the light of the decisions taken in the Writ Petitions mentioned above as also the Circular dated 29/2/2024. Similar course could be adopted in the present petitions as well. 2] Accordingly, and in terms of the order dated 16/4/2026, we permit the petitioners to move fresh representation before the concerned CEO, who shall consider the same in the light of the decisions taken in the Writ Petitions mentioned above as also the Circular dated 29/2/2024. The decision shall be taken within four weeks from the date of receiving representation. If required, the CEO shall also taken decision in respect of payment to be released from the date of stoppage of increment till its restoration. 3] The petitions are disposed of in terms of above directions. WRIT PETITION NO. 6172/2022 4] The Counsel for the petitioners submits that the grievance has been redressed. 4-WP-3510-2021 3 5] Thus, the purpose of filing the petition is served. The petition is disposed of accordingly. (JUDGE) (JUDGE) Sumit Signed by: Mr. Sumit Agrawal Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 17/09/2026 18:58:21