RAJESH KUMAR VERMA S/O SHRI GANESH LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/955/2021 · 2026-03-17
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2021
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 2409 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 2409 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 955/2021 Rajesh Kumar Verma S/o Shri Ganesh Lal, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 5, Manda Bhimsingh, Jaipur - 303604 (Rajasthan.). ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Learned Public Prosecutor.
2. Victim-, Aged About 29 Years, R/o- ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : S. Mohd. Umer Alam for Mr. Tanveer Ahamad For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary-PP Shree Ram Dhakar-PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 17/03/2026
1. By way of filing the instant petition, a prayer has been made to quash the impugned FIR No. 0007/2020 registered at Police Station Renwal, District Jaipur (Rural) for the offences under Sections 143, 323, 452, 376 of IPC and Sections 67 and 67-A of IT Act.
2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not committed any offence whatsoever and he has been falsely implicated in the instant case. Counsel submits that as per the affidavit of the prosecutrix-"B" annexed with the petition, she has stated that no offence has been committed with her and the FIR has been registered by her under pressure from her husband.
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-955/2021]
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer.
4. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record.
5. The filing of an affidavit of the prosecutrix at this stage has no bearing on the allegations levelled against the petitioner in the impugned FIR as the allegations pertain to the offence of rape, for which a charge-sheet has already been submitted against the petitioner before the competent Court of law under Section 299 Cr.P.C. and the petitioner has been absconding since the date of registration of the FIR.
6. Perusal of the contents of the impugned FIR reveal commission of a cognizable offence. The correctness of such allegations cannot be adjudged by this Court at this stage while exercising its inherent power contained under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
7. If the prosecutrix does not wish to prosecute the petitioner, she can appear in the witness box and record her evidence before the concerned Court accordingly.
8. With the aforesaid observations, the present petition stands
disposed of. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/8